QLVE vs RWEM
Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, QLVE or RWEM?
RWEM has been ahead.
QLVE has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLVE | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $17M | $71M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.02% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 169 | 450 |
| YTD Return | +12.55% | +15.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.18% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.74% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.57% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.5% | 35.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2019 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QLVE vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QLVE vs RWEM Performance
Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLVE) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, QLVE is up 12.55% versus a gain of 15.92% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLVE charges 0.18% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $52 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLVE currently yields 3.02% against 1.77% for RWEM.
Holdings Overlap
47.4% of QLVE's money is in holdings RWEM also owns. 39.0% of RWEM's money is in holdings QLVE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
34 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in QLVE and 223 in RWEM, against full books of 169 and 450.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for RWEM that do not appear in our book for QLVE (0.5% of the fund), and 1 for QLVE that do not appear in RWEM (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QLVE | Weight in RWEM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTsmc (Equity) | 14.72% | 9.30% | 5.42% |
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics Co Ltd | 6.81% | 6.38% | 0.43% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc | 4.82% | 4.62% | 0.20% |
| 0700:KYTencent Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares | 2.55% | 3.48% | 0.93% |
| 2454:TWMediatek Inc | 1.56% | 2.57% | 1.01% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 0.53% | 2.86% | 2.33% |
| 1398:HKIndustrial And Commercial Bank Of China Ltd Class H | 2.26% | 0.36% | 1.90% |
| 3034:TWNovatek Microelectronics Corp | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.20% |
| 532281:MBHcl Technologies Ltd | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.28% |
| SUN:MBSun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
47.4% of QLVE is already inside RWEM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLVE or RWEM?
QLVE has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWEM charges 0.52%. QLVE is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QLVE and RWEM?
47.4% of QLVE's money is in holdings RWEM also owns. 39.0% of RWEM's is in holdings QLVE also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in QLVE and 223 in RWEM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLVE or RWEM?
QLVE yields 3.02% while RWEM yields 1.77%, so QLVE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than QLVE?
QLVE has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.