QNXT vs QQQG
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Which is better, QNXT or QQQG?
QQQG has been ahead.
QNXT has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QNXT | QQQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $28M | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.71% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 73 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +11.95% | +27.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.64% | +29.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Best | 23.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,638 | $14,830Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.2%Best | 51.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | Aug 19, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
QNXT vs QQQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
QNXT vs QQQG Performance
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year QNXT returned +11.64% while QQQG returned +29.28%. Year to date, QNXT is up 11.95% versus a gain of 27.13% for QQQG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.5% for QNXT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for QNXT and -23.6% for QQQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QNXT charges 0.20% per year while QQQG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $49 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QNXT currently yields 0.71% against 0.06% for QQQG.
Holdings Overlap
52.4% of QNXT's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 48.1% of QQQG's money is in holdings QNXT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in QNXT and 50 in QQQG, against full books of 73 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for QQQG that do not appear in our book for QNXT (51.8% of the fund), and 32 for QNXT that do not appear in QQQG (36.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QNXT | Weight in QQQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.45% | 5.04% | 2.59% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 3.11% | 4.35% | 1.24% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 1.73% | 5.33% | 3.60% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 1.15% | 5.20% | 4.05% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 3.66% | 1.51% | 2.15% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.57% | 1.00% | 2.57% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.41% | 0.92% | 2.49% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.22% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.40% | 1.01% | 1.39% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.65% | 0.69% | 1.96% |
52.4% of QNXT is already inside QQQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QNXT or QQQG?
QNXT has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQG charges 0.49%. QNXT is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QNXT or QQQG?
Over the past year QNXT returned +11.64% vs +29.28% for QQQG, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QNXT annualized +12.42% vs +21.78% for QQQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QNXT or QQQG?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.5% for QNXT. Worst drawdown: QNXT -22.1% vs QQQG -23.6%.
Should I hold both QNXT and QQQG?
QNXT and QQQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QNXT and QQQG?
52.4% of QNXT's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 48.1% of QQQG's is in holdings QNXT also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in QNXT and 50 in QQQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QNXT or QQQG?
QNXT yields 0.71% while QQQG yields 0.06%, so QNXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQG better than QNXT?
QNXT has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.