QQMG vs VTI
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQMG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQMG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQMG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $223M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 182 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +20.37%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +23.69%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.34%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.74%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,769Best | $17,616 |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.9% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5 years).
QQMG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
QQMG vs VTI Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQMG returned +23.69% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, QQMG is up 20.37% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, QQMG compounded at +27.34% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.74% and +11.99% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for QQMG and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQMG charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQMG currently yields 0.35% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.5% of QQMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 46.9% of VTI's money is in holdings QQMG also owns.
Most of QQMG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in QQMG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 182 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,078 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQMG (50.7% of the fund), and 4 for QQMG that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQMG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.65% | 6.88% | 3.77% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.30% | 6.30% | 2.00% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.65% | 5.11% | 1.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.35% | 3.41% | 0.94% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.56% | 1.04% | 4.52% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.70% | 1.46% | 3.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.78% | 2.70% | 0.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.59% | 2.12% | 0.47% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.30% | 2.38% | 0.08% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.84% | 1.40% | 1.44% |
96.5% of QQMG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQMG or VTI?
QQMG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQMG or VTI?
Over the past year QQMG returned +23.69% vs +16.63% for VTI, so QQMG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQMG or VTI?
QQMG has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQMG -35.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both QQMG and VTI?
QQMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQMG and VTI?
96.5% of QQMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 46.9% of VTI's is in holdings QQMG also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in QQMG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQMG or VTI?
QQMG yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQMG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQMG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.