QQQ vs QTJL

QQQ vs QTJL

Which is better, QQQ or QTJL?

Large Cap Growth against Multi Alternative.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQQTJL
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.79%
AUM$506.1B$27M
Dividend Yield0.42%0.00%
Holdings32115
YTD Return+19.30%Best+10.01%
1Y Return+22.47%Best+14.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%Best+19.24%
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%Best+10.15%
Volatility (annualized)20.7%16.6%Best
Max Drawdown-35.1%-33.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$20,484Best$16,215
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap GrowthMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).

QQQ vs QTJL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs QTJL Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while QTJL returned +14.05%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 10.01% for QTJL.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.18% per year against +19.24% for QTJL; over five years the annualized figures are +15.42% and +10.15% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 16.6% for QTJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -33.4% for QTJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while QTJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for QTJL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and QTJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQQTJL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or QTJL?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QTJL charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or QTJL?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +14.05% for QTJL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or QTJL?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 16.6% for QTJL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs QTJL -33.4%.

Should I hold both QQQ and QTJL?

QQQ and QTJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or QTJL?

QQQ yields 0.42% while QTJL yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QTJL better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.