QQQ vs RANK

QQQ vs RANK

Which is better, QQQ or RANK?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQRANK
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.60%
AUM$506.1B$12M
Dividend Yield0.42%0.00%
Holdings32153
YTD Return+19.30%Best-9.57%
1Y Return+22.47%-
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%-
Top 10 Weight46.7%Best55.7%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Defiance ETFs, LLC
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 29, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs RANK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs RANK Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Defiance KSM TipRanks Analyst ETF (RANK) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 9.57% for RANK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RANK charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $60 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for RANK.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in RANK24.5%
RANK already in QQQ39.5%

24.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings RANK also owns. 39.5% of RANK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 51 in RANK, against full books of 321 and 53.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 36 positions for RANK that do not appear in our book for QQQ (59.4% of the fund), and 80 for QQQ that do not appear in RANK (71.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in RANKDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.33%6.79%1.54%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.02%9.43%4.41%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.07%5.72%1.65%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.70%4.03%2.33%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.72%3.85%2.13%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc1.35%3.55%2.20%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.0.80%1.93%1.13%
DDOGDatadog Inc0.38%1.09%0.71%
CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc.0.38%0.81%0.43%
BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Company0.23%0.67%0.44%

39.5% of RANK is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQRANK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or RANK?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RANK charges 0.60%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RANK?

39.5% of RANK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.5% of RANK's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 51 in RANK.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RANK?

QQQ yields 0.42% while RANK yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RANK better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.