QQQ vs RGEF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RGEF?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. RGEF is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RGEF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $826M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 321 | 134 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | +14.24% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | +20.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,984Best | $14,309 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | 36.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
QQQ vs RGEF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RGEF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while RGEF returned +20.05%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 14.24% for RGEF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 11.4% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -16.0% for RGEF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RGEF charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $55 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.95% for RGEF.
Holdings Overlap
40.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings RGEF also owns. 32.2% of RGEF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 65 in RGEF, against full books of 321 and 134.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for RGEF that do not appear in our book for QQQ (30.6% of the fund), and 82 for QQQ that do not appear in RGEF (55.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RGEF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.33% | 4.12% | 4.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 4.83% | 0.93% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.35% | 3.02% | 4.33% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.05% | 5.38% | 2.33% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.07% | 3.33% | 0.74% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 3.03% | 1.14% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.26% | 3.50% | 0.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.53% | 1.92% | 0.61% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.70% | 2.57% | 0.87% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 0.60% | 0.49% | 0.11% |
40.8% of QQQ is already inside RGEF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RGEF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RGEF charges 0.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RGEF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +20.05% for RGEF, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +22.41% vs +19.62% for RGEF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RGEF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 11.4% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs RGEF -16.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RGEF?
QQQ and RGEF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RGEF?
40.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings RGEF also owns. 32.2% of RGEF's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 65 in RGEF.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RGEF?
QQQ yields 0.42% while RGEF yields 0.95%, so RGEF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGEF better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. RGEF is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.