QQQ vs RGTU

QQQ vs RGTU

Which is better, QQQ or RGTU?

Large Cap Growth against Trading-Leveraged Equity.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQRGTU
Expense Ratio0.18%Best1.30%
AUM$506.1B$6M
Dividend Yield0.42%88.48%
Holdings3214
YTD Return+19.30%Best-88.83%
1Y Return+22.47%Best-98.59%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%-
Volatility (annualized)19.3%Best245.5%
Max Drawdown-12.0%Best-98.6%
$10,000 over 1.3 years$13,565Best$2,287
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Tradr ETFs
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap GrowthTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 23, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).

QQQ vs RGTU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs RGTU Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while RGTU returned -98.59%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 88.83% for RGTU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RGTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 245.5% compared with 19.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -98.6% for RGTU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RGTU charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $130 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 88.48% for RGTU.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and RGTU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQRGTU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or RGTU?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RGTU charges 1.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or RGTU?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -98.59% for RGTU, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +26.43% vs -67.85% for RGTU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or RGTU?

RGTU has been the more volatile fund at 245.5% annualized versus 19.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs RGTU -98.6%.

Should I hold both QQQ and RGTU?

QQQ and RGTU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RGTU?

QQQ yields 0.42% while RGTU yields 88.48%, so RGTU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RGTU better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.