QQQ vs RKLZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RKLZ?
Large Cap Growth against Trading-Inverse Equity.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RKLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.29% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -87.96% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -97.51% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs RKLZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RKLZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while RKLZ returned -97.51%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 87.96% for RKLZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RKLZ charges 1.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $129 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for RKLZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 1 in RKLZ, totalling 99.6% and 0.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 1 in RKLZ, against full books of 321 and 14.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RKLZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RKLZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RKLZ charges 1.29%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $111 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RKLZ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -97.51% for RKLZ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RKLZ?
QQQ yields 0.42% while RKLZ yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RKLZ better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.