QQQ vs RWLC

QQQ vs RWLC

Which is better, QQQ or RWLC?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: RWLC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQRWLC
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.32%
AUM$506.1B$100M
Dividend Yield0.42%12.70%
Holdings321208
YTD Return+19.30%Best+18.51%
1Y Return+22.47%-
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%-
Top 10 Weight46.7%37.2%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)The Advisors Inner Circle Fund
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 10, 1999Dec 15, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs RWLC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs RWLC Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $32 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 12.70% for RWLC.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in RWLC63.7%
RWLC already in QQQ52.3%

63.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 52.3% of RWLC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 321 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 68 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for QQQ (46.5% of the fund), and 62 for QQQ that do not appear in RWLC (32.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in RWLCDifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.35%9.08%1.73%
NVDANvidia Corp.8.33%6.55%1.78%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.76%2.90%2.86%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.02%2.97%2.05%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A3.05%3.56%0.51%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.07%2.30%1.77%
GOOGAlphabet, Inc.- Cl C2.85%3.16%0.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.4.17%0.22%3.95%
METAMeta Platform Inc3.26%0.81%2.45%
LRCXLam Research Corp1.72%2.08%0.36%

63.7% of QQQ is already inside RWLC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQRWLC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or RWLC?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWLC charges 0.32%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RWLC?

63.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 52.3% of RWLC's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 101 in RWLC.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RWLC?

QQQ yields 0.42% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RWLC better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.