QQQ vs SBTU
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SBTU?
Large Cap Growth against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SBTU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.50% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +19.30% | +272.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | +41.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9%Best | 1793.2% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 21, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs SBTU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SBTU Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while SBTU returned +41.35%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 272.06% for SBTU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1793.2% compared with 21.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SBTU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $150 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for SBTU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SBTU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SBTU?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SBTU charges 1.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SBTU?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +41.35% for SBTU, so SBTU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SBTU?
SBTU has been the more volatile fund at 1793.2% annualized versus 21.9% for QQQ.
Should I hold both QQQ and SBTU?
QQQ and SBTU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SBTU?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SBTU yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SBTU better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.