QQQ vs SMMV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Minimum Volatility Factor ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMMV?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SMMV is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMMV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $268M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.65% |
| Holdings | 321 | 734 |
| YTD Return | +21.69%Best | +5.70% |
| 1Y Return | +24.10%Best | +8.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.05%Best | +12.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.31%Best | +5.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -38.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,286Best | $13,119 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 12.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 7, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2016 to Oct 13, 2026 (10.1 years).
QQQ vs SMMV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SMMV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Minimum Volatility Factor ETF (SMMV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +24.10% while SMMV returned +8.33%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.69% versus a gain of 5.70% for SMMV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.05% per year against +12.68% for SMMV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.31% and +5.58% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.79% annualized vs +7.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 13.8% for SMMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -38.8% for SMMV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMMV charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $20 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 1.65% for SMMV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 360 in SMMV, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 360 in SMMV, against full books of 321 and 734.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 344 positions for SMMV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (97.0% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in SMMV (97.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMMV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMMV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMMV charges 0.20%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SMMV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.10% vs +8.33% for SMMV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +20.79% vs +7.37% for SMMV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SMMV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 13.8% for SMMV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SMMV -38.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SMMV?
QQQ and SMMV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMMV?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SMMV yields 1.65%, so SMMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMMV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SMMV is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.