QQQ vs SMYY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMYY?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMYY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.07% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 238.28% |
| Holdings | 321 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -12.71% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -35.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2%Best | 26.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -38.3% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,111Best | $6,895 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
QQQ vs SMYY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SMYY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while SMYY returned -35.88%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 12.71% for SMYY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 21.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -38.3% for SMYY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMYY charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $107 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 238.28% for SMYY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMYY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMYY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMYY charges 1.07%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SMYY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -35.88% for SMYY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +21.11% vs -31.05% for SMYY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SMYY?
SMYY has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 21.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs SMYY -38.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SMYY?
QQQ and SMYY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMYY?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SMYY yields 238.28%, so SMYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMYY better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.