QQQ vs SNOU
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T-REX 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SNOU?
Large Cap Growth against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, SNOU over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SNOU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.50% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $27M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 3.69% |
| Holdings | 321 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +19.30% | +59.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | +13.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3%Best | 196.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -85.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $15,837 | $22,680Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 25, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
QQQ vs SNOU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SNOU Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and T-REX 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while SNOU returned +13.81%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 59.60% for SNOU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 196.7% compared with 19.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -85.0% for SNOU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SNOU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $150 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 3.69% for SNOU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SNOU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SNOU?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SNOU charges 1.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SNOU?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +13.81% for SNOU, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +35.87% vs +72.62% for SNOU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SNOU?
SNOU has been the more volatile fund at 196.7% annualized versus 19.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs SNOU -85.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SNOU?
QQQ and SNOU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SNOU?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SNOU yields 3.69%, so SNOU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNOU better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, SNOU over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.