QQQ vs SSMG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SSMG?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SSMG is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 168 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -3.72% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | 25.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Virtus Investment Partners |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 21, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs SSMG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SSMG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 3.72% for SSMG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SSMG charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $39 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for SSMG.
Holdings Overlap
0.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings SSMG also owns. 2.8% of SSMG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
SSMG and QQQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 84 in SSMG, against full books of 321 and 168.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for SSMG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (85.9% of the fund), and 90 for QQQ that do not appear in SSMG (95.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SSMG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SSMG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SSMG charges 0.39%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SSMG?
2.8% of SSMG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.8% of SSMG's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 84 in SSMG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SSMG?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SSMG yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSMG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SSMG is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.