QQQ vs TEST
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TEST?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TEST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 26.39% |
| Holdings | 321 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -22.89% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -18.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs TEST growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TEST Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while TEST returned -18.09%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 22.89% for TEST.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TEST charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $101 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 26.39% for TEST.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 2 in TEST, totalling 99.6% and 54.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 2 in TEST, against full books of 321 and 26.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TEST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TEST?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TEST charges 1.01%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or TEST?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -18.09% for TEST, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TEST?
QQQ yields 0.42% while TEST yields 26.39%, so TEST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TEST better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.