QQQ vs THMR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF
Which is better, QQQ or THMR?
Large Cap Growth against Tactical Allocation.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.10% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 52 |
| YTD Return | +21.69%Best | +5.47% |
| 1Y Return | +24.10% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.31% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2%Best | 73.5% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Thor Financial Technologies |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Tactical Allocation |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 9, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs THMR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs THMR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) is an ETF from Thor Financial Technologies. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.69% versus a gain of 5.47% for THMR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while THMR charges 1.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $110 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for THMR.
Holdings Overlap
34.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings THMR also owns. 24.0% of THMR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 20 in THMR, against full books of 321 and 52.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for THMR that do not appear in our book for QQQ (75.8% of the fund), and 88 for QQQ that do not appear in THMR (63.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in THMR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.45% | 5.63% | 2.82% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.80% | 3.03% | 4.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.88% | 2.76% | 3.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.74% | 4.22% | 1.48% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.41% | 2.21% | 2.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.93% | 1.70% | 1.23% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.69% | 2.57% | 0.88% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 0.45% | 1.92% | 1.47% |
34.4% of QQQ is already inside THMR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or THMR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while THMR charges 1.10%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and THMR?
34.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings THMR also owns. 24.0% of THMR's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 20 in THMR.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or THMR?
QQQ yields 0.42% while THMR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THMR better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.