QQQ vs TMH

QQQ vs TMH

Which is better, QQQ or TMH?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTMH
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.19%
AUM$506.1B$978,486
Dividend Yield0.42%14.27%
Holdings3215
YTD Return+19.30%Best-9.75%
1Y Return+22.47%Best+6.42%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%-
Volatility (annualized)18.8%Best24.6%
Max Drawdown-15.7%Best-27.5%
$10,000 over 1.6 years$15,387Best$11,561
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)ADRH
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Mar 13, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).

QQQ vs TMH growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs TMH Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) is an ETF from ADRH. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while TMH returned +6.42%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 9.75% for TMH.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for QQQ and -27.5% for TMH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMH charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $19 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 14.27% for TMH.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 1 in TMH, totalling 99.6% and 96.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 1 in TMH, against full books of 321 and 5.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and TMH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQTMH

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMH?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMH charges 0.19%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or TMH?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +6.42% for TMH, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +30.91% vs +9.49% for TMH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or TMH?

TMH has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -15.7% vs TMH -27.5%.

Should I hold both QQQ and TMH?

QQQ and TMH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMH?

QQQ yields 0.42% while TMH yields 14.27%, so TMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TMH better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.