QQQ vs TMNL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TMNL?
Large Cap Growth against Long Term Municipal Bond.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TMNL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.26% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $24M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 3.79% |
| Holdings | 321 | 119 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -1.94% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -1.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Long Term Municipal Bond |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 19, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs TMNL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TMNL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF (TMNL) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while TMNL returned -1.54%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 1.94% for TMNL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMNL charges 0.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $26 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 3.79% for TMNL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 40 in TMNL, totalling 99.6% and 31.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 40 in TMNL, against full books of 321 and 119.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TMNL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMNL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMNL charges 0.26%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or TMNL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -1.54% for TMNL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMNL?
QQQ yields 0.42% while TMNL yields 3.79%, so TMNL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TMNL better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.