QQQ vs TSL

QQQ vs TSL

Which is better, QQQ or TSL?

Large Cap Growth against Trading-Leveraged Equity.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTSL
Expense Ratio0.18%Best1.15%
AUM$506.1B$12M
Dividend Yield0.42%0.00%
Holdings3214
YTD Return+19.30%Best-23.76%
1Y Return+22.47%Best-22.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.18%Best+5.98%
5Y Return (annualized)+15.42%-
Volatility (annualized)18.7%Best73.0%
Max Drawdown-22.8%Best-74.5%
$10,000 over 4.2 years$23,678Best$8,953
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)GraniteShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap GrowthTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionMar 10, 1999Aug 9, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.2 years).

QQQ vs TSL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs TSL Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSL) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while TSL returned -22.82%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 23.76% for TSL.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.18% per year against +5.98% for TSL. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +22.78% annualized vs -2.60%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.0% compared with 18.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -74.5% for TSL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TSL charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $115 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for TSL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and TSL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQTSL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or TSL?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TSL charges 1.15%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or TSL?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -22.82% for TSL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +22.78% vs -2.60% for TSL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or TSL?

TSL has been the more volatile fund at 73.0% annualized versus 18.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs TSL -74.5%.

Should I hold both QQQ and TSL?

QQQ and TSL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TSL?

QQQ yields 0.42% while TSL yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSL better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.