QQQ vs UBEW
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
Which is better, QQQ or UBEW?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | UBEW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 53.48% |
| Holdings | 321 | 5 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -36.03% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -46.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 19.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs UBEW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs UBEW Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while UBEW returned -46.34%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 36.03% for UBEW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 19.3% for UBEW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UBEW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $99 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 53.48% for UBEW.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 2 in UBEW, totalling 99.6% and 26.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 2 in UBEW, against full books of 321 and 5.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and UBEW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or UBEW?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UBEW charges 0.99%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or UBEW?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -46.34% for UBEW, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or UBEW?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 19.3% for UBEW.
Should I hold both QQQ and UBEW?
QQQ and UBEW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UBEW?
QQQ yields 0.42% while UBEW yields 53.48%, so UBEW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UBEW better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.