QQQ vs UXJL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July
Which is better, QQQ or UXJL?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | UXJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | +16.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0% | -10.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,909Best | $12,315 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 18, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
QQQ vs UXJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs UXJL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while UXJL returned +16.73%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 13.31% for UXJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 13.8% for UXJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -10.3% for UXJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UXJL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for UXJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and UXJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or UXJL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UXJL charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or UXJL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +16.73% for UXJL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +23.71% vs +18.95% for UXJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or UXJL?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 13.8% for UXJL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs UXJL -10.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and UXJL?
QQQ and UXJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UXJL?
QQQ yields 0.42% while UXJL yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UXJL better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.