QQQ vs WTV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WisdomTree US Value Fund
Which is better, QQQ or WTV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
WTV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $498.6B | $3.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 321 | 126 |
| YTD Return | +21.69%Best | +13.45% |
| 1Y Return | +24.10%Best | +20.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.05%Best | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.31%Best | +13.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 19.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -42.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,286Best | $18,985 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 20.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 23, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2017 to Oct 13, 2026 (8.8 years).
QQQ vs WTV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs WTV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WisdomTree US Value Fund (WTV) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.10% while WTV returned +20.22%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.69% versus a gain of 13.45% for WTV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.05% per year against +21.54% for WTV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.31% and +13.68% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.66% annualized vs +12.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 19.2% for WTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -42.2% for WTV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WTV charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $12 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 1.82% for WTV.
Holdings Overlap
23.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings WTV also owns. 15.6% of WTV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
QQQ and WTV share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 123 in WTV, against full books of 321 and 126.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 104 positions for WTV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (78.7% of the fund), and 82 for QQQ that do not appear in WTV (74.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in WTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.45% | 3.28% | 5.17% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.85% | 0.58% | 4.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.95% | 1.82% | 0.13% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.44% | 1.40% | 0.04% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.85% | 1.02% | 0.17% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 0.45% | 1.37% | 0.92% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.13% | 0.81% | 0.68% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.01% |
23.0% of QQQ is already inside WTV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WTV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WTV charges 0.12%. WTV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WTV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.10% vs +20.22% for WTV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), QQQ annualized +19.66% vs +12.55% for WTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WTV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 19.2% for WTV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WTV -42.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WTV?
QQQ and WTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WTV?
23.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings WTV also owns. 15.6% of WTV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 123 in WTV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WTV?
QQQ yields 0.42% while WTV yields 1.82%, so WTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTV better than QQQ?
WTV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.