QQQ vs XBOX
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XBOX?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
XBOX has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XBOX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.14%Best |
| AUM | $506.1B | $373M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | +2.37% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 18, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs XBOX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs XBOX Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 2.37% for XBOX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XBOX charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $14 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for XBOX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 5 in XBOX, totalling 99.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 5 in XBOX, against full books of 321 and 12.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for XBOX that do not appear in our book for QQQ (100.0% of the fund), and 93 for QQQ that do not appear in XBOX (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and XBOX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XBOX?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XBOX charges 0.14%. XBOX is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XBOX?
QQQ yields 0.42% while XBOX yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBOX better than QQQ?
XBOX has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.