QRFT vs SPYT
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF vs Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
Which is better, QRFT or SPYT?
Nearly the same fund. QRFT costs less.
QRFT has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRFT | SPYT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.92% |
| AUM | $9M | $170M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 20.83% |
| Holdings | 301 | 10 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -18.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $14,829Best | $13,945 |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Mar 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 85 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QRFT has data through Jul 21, 2026 and SPYT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Jul 21, 2026 (2.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QRFT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 11.2% for SPYT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for QRFT and -18.3% for SPYT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRFT charges 0.75% per year while SPYT charges 0.92%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $92 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRFT currently yields 0.25% against 20.83% for SPYT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 294 holdings in QRFT and 1 in SPYT, totalling 99.2% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 154 days apart, QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026 and SPYT as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in QRFT and 1 in SPYT, against full books of 301 and 10.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QRFT and SPYT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRFT or SPYT?
QRFT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SPYT charges 0.92%. QRFT is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QRFT or SPYT?
QRFT has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 11.2% for SPYT. Worst drawdown: QRFT -20.0% vs SPYT -18.3%.
Should I hold both QRFT and SPYT?
QRFT and SPYT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRFT or SPYT?
QRFT yields 0.25% while SPYT yields 20.83%, so SPYT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPYT better than QRFT?
QRFT has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.