QTAP vs QTJA

QTAP vs QTJA

Which is better, QTAP or QTJA?

QTAP has been ahead.

QTAP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: QTAP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQTAPQTJA
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$20M$25M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1415
YTD Return+18.66%Best+15.68%
1Y Return+21.94%Best+19.36%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.44%Best+18.18%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.86%-
Volatility (annualized)16.6%Best16.9%
Max Drawdown-29.4%Best-36.1%
$10,000 over 4.8 years$17,676Best$13,366
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 31, 2021Dec 31, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).

QTAP vs QTJA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.

Compare QTAP against instead:QTAP vs SPYQTAP vs QQQQTAP vs VOOQTAP vs VTIQTJA against:QTJA vs VXUS

QTAP vs QTJA Performance

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year QTAP returned +21.94% while QTJA returned +19.36%. Year to date, QTAP is up 18.66% versus a gain of 15.68% for QTJA.

Over three years, QTAP compounded at +20.44% per year against +18.18% for QTJA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QTJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.6% for QTAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.4% for QTAP and -36.1% for QTJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QTAP charges 0.79% per year while QTJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, QTAP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QTJA.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QTAP and QTJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QTAPQTJA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QTAP or QTJA?

QTAP has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QTJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, QTAP or QTJA?

Over the past year QTAP returned +21.94% vs +19.36% for QTJA, so QTAP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QTAP or QTJA?

QTJA has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.6% for QTAP. Worst drawdown: QTAP -29.4% vs QTJA -36.1%.

Should I hold both QTAP and QTJA?

QTAP and QTJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QTAP or QTJA?

QTAP yields 0.00% while QTJA yields 0.00%, so QTJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QTJA better than QTAP?

QTAP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.