RBUF vs URTY
Innovator US Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
Which is better, RBUF or URTY?
URTY has been ahead.
RBUF has a lower expense ratio. URTY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBUF | URTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $106M | $273M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| Holdings | 18 | 1,996 |
| YTD Return | +5.51% | +13.93%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.61% | +11.19%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.69% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -9.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.8%Best | 54.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.4%Best | -66.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,313 | $15,064Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2024 | Feb 9, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
RBUF vs URTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
RBUF vs URTY Performance
Innovator US Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (RBUF) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year RBUF returned +6.61% while URTY returned +11.19%. Year to date, RBUF is up 5.51% versus a gain of 13.93% for URTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.0% compared with 5.8% for RBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.4% for RBUF and -66.0% for URTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBUF charges 0.79% per year while URTY charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $95 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBUF currently yields 0.00% against 0.94% for URTY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RBUF and URTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBUF or URTY?
RBUF has an expense ratio of 0.79% while URTY charges 0.95%. RBUF is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RBUF or URTY?
Over the past year RBUF returned +6.61% vs +11.19% for URTY, so URTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RBUF annualized +9.47% vs +19.50% for URTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RBUF or URTY?
URTY has been the more volatile fund at 54.0% annualized versus 5.8% for RBUF. Worst drawdown: RBUF -11.4% vs URTY -66.0%.
Should I hold both RBUF and URTY?
RBUF and URTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBUF or URTY?
RBUF yields 0.00% while URTY yields 0.94%, so URTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is URTY better than RBUF?
RBUF has a lower expense ratio. URTY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.