RBUF vs UWM
Innovator US Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs ProShares Ultra Russell2000
Which is better, RBUF or UWM?
UWM has been ahead.
RBUF has a lower expense ratio. UWM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBUF | UWM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $106M | $219M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| Holdings | 18 | 1,994 |
| YTD Return | +5.51% | +12.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.61% | +12.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.8%Best | 35.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.4%Best | -50.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,313 | $15,056Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2024 | Jan 23, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
RBUF vs UWM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
RBUF vs UWM Performance
Innovator US Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (RBUF) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year RBUF returned +6.61% while UWM returned +12.33%. Year to date, RBUF is up 5.51% versus a gain of 12.94% for UWM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.7% compared with 5.8% for RBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.4% for RBUF and -50.0% for UWM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBUF charges 0.79% per year while UWM charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $95 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBUF currently yields 0.00% against 0.87% for UWM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RBUF and UWM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBUF or UWM?
RBUF has an expense ratio of 0.79% while UWM charges 0.95%. RBUF is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RBUF or UWM?
Over the past year RBUF returned +6.61% vs +12.33% for UWM, so UWM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RBUF annualized +9.47% vs +19.47% for UWM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RBUF or UWM?
UWM has been the more volatile fund at 35.7% annualized versus 5.8% for RBUF. Worst drawdown: RBUF -11.4% vs UWM -50.0%.
Should I hold both RBUF and UWM?
RBUF and UWM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBUF or UWM?
RBUF yields 0.00% while UWM yields 0.87%, so UWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UWM better than RBUF?
RBUF has a lower expense ratio. UWM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.