RECI vs VTI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RECI or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RECI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 715 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +2.97% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RECI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RECI vs VTI Performance
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF (RECI) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RECI is up 2.97% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RECI charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RECI currently yields 0.67% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 35.7% of VTI's money is in holdings RECI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RECI, our book for it covers 80.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
338 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in RECI and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 715 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RECI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.27% | 6.88% | 3.39% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.59% | 6.30% | 3.29% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.76% | 1.70% | 2.06% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.01% | 1.46% | 0.55% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.83% | 0.63% | 1.20% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.37% | 0.54% | 0.83% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.23% | 0.53% | 0.70% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.84% | 0.55% | 0.29% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.84% | 0.53% | 0.31% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 1.04% | 0.20% | 0.84% |
35.7% of VTI is already inside RECI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RECI or VTI?
RECI has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RECI and VTI?
At least 35.7% of VTI's money is in holdings RECI also owns. Our book for RECI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 338 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in RECI and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RECI or VTI?
RECI yields 0.67% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RECI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.