RESM vs RUSC
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF vs Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, RESM or RUSC?
RESM costs less.
RESM has a lower expense ratio. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RESM | RUSC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.64% |
| AUM | $6M | $81M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 2,051 | 491 |
| YTD Return | +13.69%Best | +13.09% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.59% |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.5% | 5.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | May 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RESM vs RUSC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RESM vs RUSC Performance
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF (RUSC) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Year to date, RESM is up 13.69% versus a gain of 13.09% for RUSC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RESM charges 0.32% per year while RUSC charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $64 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RESM currently yields 0.08% against 0.33% for RUSC.
Holdings Overlap
10.4% of RESM's money is in holdings RUSC also owns. 0.1% of RUSC's money is in holdings RESM also owns.
RESM and RUSC share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 489 in RUSC, against full books of 2,051 and 491.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 377 positions for RUSC that do not appear in our book for RESM (77.2% of the fund), and 6 for RESM that do not appear in RUSC (17.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RESM | Weight in RUSC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 10.45% | 0.09% | 10.36% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RESM and RUSC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RESM or RUSC?
RESM has an expense ratio of 0.32% while RUSC charges 0.64%. RESM is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RESM and RUSC?
10.4% of RESM's money is in holdings RUSC also owns. 0.1% of RUSC's is in holdings RESM also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 489 in RUSC.
Which pays a higher dividend, RESM or RUSC?
RESM yields 0.08% while RUSC yields 0.33%, so RUSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RUSC better than RESM?
RESM has a lower expense ratio. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.