RESM vs VXUS
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, RESM or VXUS?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RESM | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 2,051 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | +13.69%Best | +10.00% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RESM vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RESM vs VXUS Performance
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RESM is up 13.69% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RESM charges 0.32% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $5 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RESM currently yields 0.08% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 36.4% of RESM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 2,051 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RESM | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYC:AULynas Corp Ltd | 9.81% | 0.02% | 9.79% |
| PLS:AUPilbara Minerals Limited Ordinary Fully Paid | 8.74% | 0.03% | 8.71% |
| ILU:AUIluka Resources Ltd | 4.11% | 0.00% | 4.11% |
| EQR:AUEq Resources Ltd | 3.47% | 0.00% | 3.47% |
| LTR:AULiontown Resources Limited | 3.32% | 0.00% | 3.32% |
| ARU:AUArafura Rare Earths Ltd | 1.66% | 0.00% | 1.66% |
| ELV:AUElevra Lithium Ltd | 1.50% | 0.00% | 1.50% |
| ERA:PAEramet SA | 1.47% | 0.00% | 1.47% |
| IPXIperionx Limited American Depositary Shares Each Representing 10 Ordinary Shares, No Par Value(1) | 1.14% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
| VUL:AUVulcan Energy Resources Ltd | 1.13% | 0.00% | 1.13% |
36.4% of RESM is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RESM or VXUS?
RESM has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RESM and VXUS?
At least 36.4% of RESM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, RESM or VXUS?
RESM yields 0.08% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than RESM?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.