RFCI vs RSBT
ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF vs Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, RFCI or RSBT?
Each has led over a different period.
RFCI has a lower expense ratio. RFCI led over 3Y and the full window, RSBT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RFCI | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $13M | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.76% | 2.95% |
| Holdings | 48 | 34 |
| YTD Return | -1.66% | +8.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.45% | +8.40%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.92%Best | +4.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.12% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.8%Best | 11.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.5%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $11,216Best | $10,019 |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2016 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
RFCI vs RSBT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
RFCI vs RSBT Performance
ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year RFCI returned -1.45% while RSBT returned +8.40%. Year to date, RFCI is down 1.66% versus a gain of 8.40% for RSBT.
Over three years, RFCI compounded at +4.92% per year against +4.37% for RSBT. Across the full 4-year window we track, RFCI has the edge at +3.15% annualized vs +0.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.2% compared with 4.8% for RFCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.5% for RFCI and -23.6% for RSBT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RFCI charges 0.51% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $101 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFCI currently yields 4.76% against 2.95% for RSBT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 37 holdings in RFCI and 2 in RSBT, totalling 83.6% and 90.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in RFCI and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 48 and 34.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RFCI and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RFCI or RSBT?
RFCI has an expense ratio of 0.51% while RSBT charges 1.01%. RFCI is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RFCI or RSBT?
Over the past year RFCI returned -1.45% vs +8.40% for RSBT, so RSBT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RFCI annualized +3.15% vs +0.05% for RSBT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RFCI or RSBT?
RSBT has been the more volatile fund at 11.2% annualized versus 4.8% for RFCI. Worst drawdown: RFCI -5.5% vs RSBT -23.6%.
Should I hold both RFCI and RSBT?
RFCI and RSBT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RFCI or RSBT?
RFCI yields 4.76% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so RFCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSBT better than RFCI?
RFCI has a lower expense ratio. RFCI led over 3Y and the full window, RSBT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.