RFDA vs WBIG
ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, RFDA or WBIG?
RFDA has been ahead.
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RFDA | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $77M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.00% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 77 | 159 |
| YTD Return | +14.73%Best | +12.49% |
| 1Y Return | +16.68%Best | +11.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.07%Best | +7.85% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87%Best | +1.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.8% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,319Best | $10,789 |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.6% | 23.9%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 6, 2016 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 7, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.4 years).
RFDA vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.4 years both funds cover.
RFDA vs WBIG Performance
ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year RFDA returned +16.68% while WBIG returned +11.17%. Year to date, RFDA is up 14.73% versus a gain of 12.49% for WBIG.
Over three years, RFDA compounded at +20.07% per year against +7.85% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.87% and +1.53% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, RFDA has the edge at +12.11% annualized vs +3.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RFDA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.7% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for RFDA and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RFDA charges 0.52% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $159 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFDA currently yields 2.00% against 1.17% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
8.8% of RFDA's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 9.4% of WBIG's money is in holdings RFDA also owns.
WBIG and RFDA share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in RFDA and 71 in WBIG, against full books of 77 and 159.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 61 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for RFDA (83.2% of the fund), and 66 for RFDA that do not appear in WBIG (87.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RFDA and WBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RFDA or WBIG?
RFDA has an expense ratio of 0.52% while WBIG charges 1.59%. RFDA is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RFDA or WBIG?
Over the past year RFDA returned +16.68% vs +11.17% for WBIG, so RFDA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RFDA annualized +12.11% vs +3.45% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RFDA or WBIG?
RFDA has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.7% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: RFDA -34.8% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both RFDA and WBIG?
RFDA and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RFDA and WBIG?
9.4% of WBIG's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 9.4% of WBIG's is in holdings RFDA also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in RFDA and 71 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, RFDA or WBIG?
RFDA yields 2.00% while WBIG yields 1.17%, so RFDA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than RFDA?
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.