RJCA vs VTI

RJCA vs VTI

Which is better, RJCA or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): RJCALess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRJCAVTI
Expense Ratio0.61%0.03%Best
AUM$617M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings723,524
YTD Return+4.02%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight57.0%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyCarillon Family of FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 21, 2006May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RJCA vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RJCA vs VTI Performance

RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RJCA is up 4.02% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RJCA charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RJCA currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RJCA already in VTI99.3%
VTI already in RJCA45.3%

99.3% of RJCA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.3% of VTI's money is in holdings RJCA also owns.

Most of RJCA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

70 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RJCA and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 72 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,087 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RJCA (52.4% of the fund), and 1 for RJCA that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RJCAWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp15.22%6.88%8.34%
AAPLApple, Inc7.19%6.30%0.89%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.85%5.11%2.74%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.18%2.38%2.80%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.73%2.70%2.03%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.68%2.12%1.56%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.94%3.41%1.47%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.87%1.46%2.41%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.16%1.70%1.46%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.09%1.33%1.76%

99.3% of RJCA is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RJCAVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RJCA or VTI?

RJCA has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RJCA and VTI?

99.3% of RJCA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.3% of VTI's is in holdings RJCA also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RJCA and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RJCA or VTI?

RJCA yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RJCA?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.