RJMG vs SCHX
FT Raymond James Multicap Growth Equity ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, RJMG or SCHX?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. RJMG led over 1Y, SCHX over the full window. RJMG is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RJMG | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 41 | 752 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -19.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,729 | $14,999Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 36.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2024 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 279 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RJMG has data through Jan 9, 2026 and SCHX through Oct 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 18, 2024 to Jan 9, 2026 (2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RJMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 10.8% for SCHX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for RJMG and -19.0% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RJMG charges 0.85% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RJMG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
82.9% of RJMG's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 17.7% of SCHX's money is in holdings RJMG also owns.
Most of RJMG is already inside SCHX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 337 days apart, RJMG as of Oct 31, 2025 and SCHX as of Oct 3, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
33 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in RJMG and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 41 and 752.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 696 positions for SCHX that do not appear in our book for RJMG (81.5% of the fund), and 6 for RJMG that do not appear in SCHX (14.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RJMG | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.44% | 5.44% | 3.00% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.78% | 2.86% | 0.08% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.03% | 2.28% | 0.25% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 3.53% | 0.08% | 3.45% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.46% | 0.87% | 1.59% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.93% | 0.24% | 2.69% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.41% | 0.66% | 1.75% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 2.41% | 0.58% | 1.83% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 2.75% | 0.23% | 2.52% |
82.9% of RJMG is already inside SCHX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RJMG or SCHX?
RJMG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, RJMG or SCHX?
RJMG has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 10.8% for SCHX. Worst drawdown: RJMG -25.4% vs SCHX -19.0%.
Should I hold both RJMG and SCHX?
RJMG and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RJMG and SCHX?
82.9% of RJMG's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 17.7% of SCHX's is in holdings RJMG also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in RJMG and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, RJMG or SCHX?
RJMG yields 0.00% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than RJMG?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. RJMG led over 1Y, SCHX over the full window. RJMG is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.