RKNG vs VOO

RKNG vs VOO

Which is better, RKNG or VOO?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RKNG is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: RKNG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRKNGVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings64506
YTD Return-12.03%+13.57%Best
1Y Return-+17.55%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight37.4%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 21, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RKNG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RKNG vs VOO Performance

Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RKNG is down 12.03% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RKNG charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RKNG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

RKNG already in VOO41.7%
VOO already in RKNG5.9%

41.7% of RKNG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.9% of VOO's money is in holdings RKNG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in RKNG and 504 in VOO, against full books of 64 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RKNG (93.9% of the fund), and 18 for RKNG that do not appear in VOO (55.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RKNGWeight in VOODifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.46%1.64%1.82%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.69%1.16%2.53%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc3.95%0.36%3.59%
INTCIntel Corporation3.52%0.67%2.85%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc3.45%0.65%2.80%
MRNAModerna therapeutics3.97%0.07%3.90%
DDOGDatadog Inc3.84%0.12%3.72%
SNDKVSandisk Corp.3.39%0.35%3.04%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc3.43%0.28%3.15%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.3.14%0.23%2.91%

41.7% of RKNG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RKNGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RKNG or VOO?

RKNG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RKNG and VOO?

41.7% of RKNG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.9% of VOO's is in holdings RKNG also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in RKNG and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, RKNG or VOO?

RKNG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than RKNG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RKNG is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.