RKSG vs VTI

RKSG vs VTI

Which is better, RKSG or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRKSGVTI
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%Best
AUM$3M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings4783,524
YTD Return+14.66%Best+13.02%
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight43.8%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyRuk Funds Management, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 31, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RKSG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RKSG vs VTI Performance

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) is an ETF from Ruk Funds Management, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RKSG is up 14.66% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RKSG charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RKSG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RKSG already in VTI95.8%
VTI already in RKSG60.8%

95.8% of RKSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 60.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RKSG also owns.

Most of RKSG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

229 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in RKSG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 478 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 929 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RKSG (36.8% of the fund), and 3 for RKSG that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RKSGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp11.37%6.88%4.49%
AAPLApple, Inc8.19%6.30%1.89%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.73%5.11%0.38%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.68%2.70%1.98%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.82%3.41%0.59%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.67%1.33%2.34%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.19%2.38%0.19%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.67%1.70%0.03%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.15%0.87%1.28%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.06%0.49%1.57%

95.8% of RKSG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RKSGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RKSG or VTI?

RKSG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RKSG and VTI?

95.8% of RKSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 60.8% of VTI's is in holdings RKSG also owns. They hold 229 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in RKSG and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RKSG or VTI?

RKSG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RKSG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.