RLTY vs VOO
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RLTY or VOO?
Debt-oriented balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RLTY | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $265M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 8.49% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 232 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -0.58% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.14% | +17.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.99% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.4% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $10,241 | $19,104Best |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Debt-oriented balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
RLTY vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
RLTY vs VOO Performance
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RLTY returned -1.14% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, RLTY is down 0.58% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Over three years, RLTY compounded at +12.99% per year against +22.46% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.5% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for RLTY and -22.1% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RLTY charges 1.19% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $3 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RLTY currently yields 8.49% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RLTY also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RLTY, our book for it covers 89.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VOO and RLTY share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, RLTY as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in RLTY and 504 in VOO, against full books of 232 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RLTY | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 11.38% | 0.25% | 11.13% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 6.46% | 0.10% | 6.36% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 4.81% | 0.05% | 4.76% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 3.20% | 0.12% | 3.08% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 3.11% | 0.20% | 2.91% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 2.47% | 0.16% | 2.31% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 2.18% | 0.08% | 2.10% |
| EXRExtra Space Storage Inc | 2.19% | 0.05% | 2.14% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 1.98% | 0.05% | 1.93% |
| BXPBoston Properties Inc | 1.86% | 0.02% | 1.84% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RLTY and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RLTY or VOO?
RLTY has an expense ratio of 1.19% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $116 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RLTY or VOO?
Over the past year RLTY returned -1.14% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RLTY or VOO?
RLTY has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.5% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RLTY -35.4% vs VOO -22.1%.
Should I hold both RLTY and VOO?
RLTY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RLTY and VOO?
At least 1.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RLTY also owns. Our book for RLTY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in RLTY and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RLTY or VOO?
RLTY yields 8.49% while VOO yields 1.06%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RLTY?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.