ROSC vs VTI
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ROSC or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ROSC is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROSC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $48M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 319 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +16.50%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +23.06%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.89% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.74% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,204 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.9%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.6 years).
ROSC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
ROSC vs VTI Performance
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROSC returned +23.06% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, ROSC is up 16.50% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, ROSC compounded at +16.89% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.74% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.09% annualized vs +7.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.3% for ROSC and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROSC charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROSC currently yields 1.99% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.9% of ROSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings ROSC also owns.
Most of ROSC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
302 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in ROSC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 319 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,115 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ROSC (97.2% of the fund), and 5 for ROSC that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROSC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INDV:MBIndivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ordinary Shares | 1.02% | 0.01% | 1.01% |
| HAEHaemonetics Corp | 1.01% | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| HRMYHarmony Biosciences, Llc | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| NHCNational Healthcare Corporation | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| OSPNOnespan Inc | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| OGNOrganon & Co | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| PLUSEplus Inc | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| IDTIdt Corp | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| MDMednax | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| TDCTeradata Corp | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.95% |
95.9% of ROSC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROSC or VTI?
ROSC has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROSC or VTI?
Over the past year ROSC returned +23.06% vs +16.63% for VTI, so ROSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ROSC annualized +7.82% vs +12.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROSC or VTI?
ROSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ROSC -46.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ROSC and VTI?
ROSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROSC and VTI?
95.9% of ROSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings ROSC also owns. They hold 302 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in ROSC and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROSC or VTI?
ROSC yields 1.99% while VTI yields 1.06%, so ROSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ROSC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ROSC is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.