RSJN vs VOO
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RSJN or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSJN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.36% | +17.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3%Best | 11.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,355 | $14,564Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
RSJN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
RSJN vs VOO Performance
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSJN returned +11.36% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, RSJN is up 8.70% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 7.3% for RSJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for RSJN and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSJN charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSJN currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSJN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSJN or VOO?
RSJN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSJN or VOO?
Over the past year RSJN returned +11.36% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSJN annualized +9.63% vs +17.76% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSJN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 7.3% for RSJN. Worst drawdown: RSJN -12.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both RSJN and VOO?
RSJN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSJN or VOO?
RSJN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RSJN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.