RSMR vs RSP
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Which is better, RSMR or RSP?
Nearly the same fund. RSP costs less.
RSP has a lower expense ratio. RSP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMR | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $98.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.53% |
| Holdings | 10 | 1,533 |
| YTD Return | +9.11% | +11.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.12% | +14.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 10.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.1%Best | -12.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $11,863 | $12,440Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | Apr 24, 2003 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
RSMR vs RSP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
RSMR vs RSP Performance
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March (RSMR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year RSMR returned +12.12% while RSP returned +14.33%. Year to date, RSMR is up 9.11% versus a gain of 11.29% for RSP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.3% compared with 5.3% for RSMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for RSMR and -12.9% for RSP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMR charges 0.85% per year while RSP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $20 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMR currently yields 0.00% against 1.53% for RSP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSMR and RSP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMR or RSP?
RSMR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while RSP charges 0.20%. RSP is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSMR or RSP?
Over the past year RSMR returned +12.12% vs +14.33% for RSP, so RSP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMR annualized +11.27% vs +14.62% for RSP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSMR or RSP?
RSP has been the more volatile fund at 10.3% annualized versus 5.3% for RSMR. Worst drawdown: RSMR -9.1% vs RSP -12.9%.
Should I hold both RSMR and RSP?
RSMR and RSP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMR or RSP?
RSMR yields 0.00% while RSP yields 1.53%, so RSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSP better than RSMR?
RSP has a lower expense ratio. RSP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.