RSMV vs VTI
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSMV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 23 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +4.41% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.60% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,580 | $13,238Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
RSMV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
RSMV vs VTI Performance
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMV returned +8.60% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RSMV is up 4.41% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 11.3% for RSMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for RSMV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMV charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMV currently yields 0.96% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.1% of RSMV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 22.6% of VTI's money is in holdings RSMV also owns.
Most of RSMV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 23 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 21 and 3,441 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,136 positions RSMV does not, 75.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.88%, AMZN 3.41%, GOOGL 2.70%, AVGO 2.38%, GOOG 2.12%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSMV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.78% | 6.30% | 1.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.02% | 5.11% | 0.09% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.11% | 1.70% | 3.41% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.56% | 1.29% | 3.27% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.21% | 0.55% | 4.66% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 4.78% | 0.90% | 3.88% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 5.08% | 0.42% | 4.66% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.64% | 0.85% | 3.79% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.55% | 0.87% | 3.68% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.77% | 0.61% | 4.16% |
95.1% of RSMV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMV or VTI?
RSMV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSMV or VTI?
Over the past year RSMV returned +8.60% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMV annualized +9.01% vs +17.94% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSMV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 11.3% for RSMV. Worst drawdown: RSMV -17.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RSMV and VTI?
RSMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSMV and VTI?
95.1% of RSMV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 22.6% of VTI's is in holdings RSMV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMV or VTI?
RSMV yields 0.96% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSMV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.