RSPA vs RUNN
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
Which is better, RSPA or RUNN?
RSPA has been ahead.
RSPA has a lower expense ratio. RSPA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPA | RUNN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $393M |
| Dividend Yield | 9.44% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 525 | 118 |
| YTD Return | +9.96%Best | +0.21% |
| 1Y Return | +12.11%Best | -0.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4%Best | -16.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $12,643Best | $10,633 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Running Oak Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 17, 2024 | Jun 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
RSPA vs RUNN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
RSPA vs RUNN Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is an ETF from Running Oak Capital. Over the past year RSPA returned +12.11% while RUNN returned -0.80%. Year to date, RSPA is up 9.96% versus a gain of 0.21% for RUNN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RUNN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 9.1% for RSPA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for RSPA and -16.8% for RUNN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPA charges 0.29% per year while RUNN charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $58 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPA currently yields 9.44% against 0.57% for RUNN.
Holdings Overlap
At least 70.6% of RUNN's money is in holdings RSPA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RSPA, our book for it covers 94.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of RUNN is already inside RSPA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
41 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in RSPA and 59 in RUNN, against full books of 525 and 118.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPA | Weight in RUNN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 0.23% | 2.86% | 2.63% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc. | 0.18% | 2.52% | 2.34% |
| IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc. | 0.21% | 2.45% | 2.24% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.17% | 2.05% | 1.88% |
| FDSFactset Research Systems Inc. | 0.15% | 2.00% | 1.85% |
| JJacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 0.17% | 1.96% | 1.79% |
| CNCCentene | 0.15% | 1.95% | 1.80% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 0.15% | 1.95% | 1.80% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.16% | 1.93% | 1.77% |
| AJGArthur J Gallagher & Co. | 0.16% | 1.91% | 1.75% |
70.6% of RUNN is already inside RSPA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPA or RUNN?
RSPA has an expense ratio of 0.29% while RUNN charges 0.58%. RSPA is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPA or RUNN?
Over the past year RSPA returned +12.11% vs -0.80% for RUNN, so RSPA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSPA annualized +11.25% vs +2.83% for RUNN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPA or RUNN?
RUNN has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 9.1% for RSPA. Worst drawdown: RSPA -15.4% vs RUNN -16.8%.
Should I hold both RSPA and RUNN?
RSPA and RUNN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPA and RUNN?
At least 70.6% of RUNN's money is in holdings RSPA also owns. Our book for RSPA is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in RSPA and 59 in RUNN.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPA or RUNN?
RSPA yields 9.44% while RUNN yields 0.57%, so RSPA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RUNN better than RSPA?
RSPA has a lower expense ratio. RSPA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.