RSPM vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSPM or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $172M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +10.29% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.07%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.16% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.23% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.5% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,302 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.9 years).
RSPM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
RSPM vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPM returned +18.07% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RSPM is up 10.29% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPM compounded at +9.16% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.23% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.37% annualized vs +7.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.5% for RSPM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPM charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPM currently yields 1.85% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
92.5% of RSPM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.6% of VTI's money is in holdings RSPM also owns.
Most of RSPM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in RSPM and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RSPM (96.0% of the fund), and 2 for RSPM that do not appear in VTI (7.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.35% | 0.31% | 4.04% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 4.27% | 0.10% | 4.17% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 4.21% | 0.11% | 4.10% |
| PKGPackaging Corp. Of America | 4.28% | 0.03% | 4.25% |
| SWSmurfit WestRock plc Common Shares | 4.26% | 0.03% | 4.23% |
| AVYAvery Dennison Corp. | 4.23% | 0.02% | 4.21% |
| IFFInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 4.16% | 0.03% | 4.13% |
| PPGPpg Industries Inc. | 4.15% | 0.03% | 4.12% |
| VMCVulcan Materials Co. | 4.11% | 0.05% | 4.06% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 4.00% | 0.15% | 3.85% |
92.5% of RSPM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPM or VTI?
RSPM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPM or VTI?
Over the past year RSPM returned +18.07% vs +16.63% for VTI, so RSPM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPM annualized +7.55% vs +9.37% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPM or VTI?
RSPM has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPM -62.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPM and VTI?
RSPM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPM and VTI?
92.5% of RSPM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.6% of VTI's is in holdings RSPM also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in RSPM and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPM or VTI?
RSPM yields 1.85% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RSPM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSPM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.