RSSL vs VAMO
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF
Which is better, RSSL or VAMO?
RSSL has been ahead.
RSSL has a lower expense ratio. RSSL led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VAMO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $86M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.29% | 0.68% |
| Holdings | 1,981 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +9.62%Best | +3.07% |
| 1Y Return | +10.21%Best | +5.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.96% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -11.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,575Best | $12,631 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Cambria Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Sep 8, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
RSSL vs VAMO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
RSSL vs VAMO Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF (VAMO) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year RSSL returned +10.21% while VAMO returned +5.56%. Year to date, RSSL is up 9.62% versus a gain of 3.07% for VAMO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.3% for VAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -11.6% for VAMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VAMO charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $65 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.29% against 0.68% for VAMO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 43.4% of VAMO's money is in holdings RSSL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RSSL, our book for it covers 90.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
48 positions in common, counted across the 1,560 positions we hold weights for in RSSL and 102 in VAMO, against full books of 1,981 and 206.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSSL | Weight in VAMO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMBFUmb Financial Corp. | 0.34% | 0.90% | 0.56% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.30% | 0.93% | 0.63% |
| PBFPbf Energy Inc | 0.25% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
| MATXMatson Inc | 0.23% | 0.90% | 0.67% |
| TEXTerex Corp | 0.23% | 0.89% | 0.66% |
| PLXSPlexus Corp | 0.23% | 0.86% | 0.63% |
| HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.94% | 0.80% |
| ENSEnersys | 0.22% | 0.86% | 0.64% |
| MURMurphy Oil Corp | 0.17% | 0.91% | 0.74% |
| BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.94% | 0.80% |
43.4% of VAMO is already inside RSSL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VAMO?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VAMO charges 0.65%. RSSL is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSSL or VAMO?
Over the past year RSSL returned +10.21% vs +5.56% for VAMO, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +13.58% vs +10.22% for VAMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VAMO?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.3% for VAMO. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VAMO -11.6%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VAMO?
RSSL and VAMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VAMO?
At least 43.4% of VAMO's money is in holdings RSSL also owns. Our book for RSSL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 1,560 positions we hold weights for in RSSL and 102 in VAMO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VAMO?
RSSL yields 1.29% while VAMO yields 0.68%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VAMO better than RSSL?
RSSL has a lower expense ratio. RSSL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.