RSST vs XBJL

RSST vs XBJL

Which is better, RSST or XBJL?

RSST has been ahead.

XBJL has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: XBJLHigher Returns: RSST

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRSSTXBJL
Expense Ratio0.99%0.79%Best
AUM$602M$78M
Dividend Yield0.23%0.00%
Holdings3627
YTD Return+23.59%Best+8.04%
1Y Return+29.48%Best+10.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.67%Best+12.76%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.48%
Volatility (annualized)17.2%5.4%Best
Max Drawdown-30.8%-11.7%Best
$10,000 over 3.1 years$17,557Best$14,217
Fund FamilyReturn Stacked ETFInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionSep 6, 2023Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 6, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.1 years).

RSST vs XBJL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare RSST against instead:RSST vs SPYRSST vs QQQRSST vs VOORSST vs VTIXBJL against:XBJL vs VXUS

RSST vs XBJL Performance

Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year RSST returned +29.48% while XBJL returned +10.65%. Year to date, RSST is up 23.59% versus a gain of 8.04% for XBJL.

Over three years, RSST compounded at +21.67% per year against +12.76% for XBJL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RSST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 5.4% for XBJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.8% for RSST and -11.7% for XBJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RSST charges 0.99% per year while XBJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $79 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSST currently yields 0.23% against 0.00% for XBJL.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in RSST and 1 in XBJL, totalling 88.8% and 98.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in RSST and 1 in XBJL, against full books of 36 and 27.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RSST and XBJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RSSTXBJL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RSST or XBJL?

RSST has an expense ratio of 0.99% while XBJL charges 0.79%. XBJL is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RSST or XBJL?

Over the past year RSST returned +29.48% vs +10.65% for XBJL, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RSST or XBJL?

RSST has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 5.4% for XBJL. Worst drawdown: RSST -30.8% vs XBJL -11.7%.

Should I hold both RSST and XBJL?

RSST and XBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, RSST or XBJL?

RSST yields 0.23% while XBJL yields 0.00%, so RSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XBJL better than RSST?

XBJL has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.