RXI vs VTI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RXI or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RXI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $303M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 149 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -8.03% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.35% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.37% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.15% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,677 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 21, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (20.1 years).
RXI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.1 years both funds cover.
RXI vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RXI returned -6.35% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RXI is down 8.03% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, RXI compounded at +10.37% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.15% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.57% annualized vs +6.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for RXI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RXI charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RXI currently yields 1.53% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
58.7% of RXI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.0% of VTI's money is in holdings RXI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
45 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in RXI and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 149 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,111 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RXI (89.5% of the fund), and 3 for RXI that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RXI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 16.49% | 3.41% | 13.08% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 6.76% | 1.40% | 5.36% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 4.21% | 0.44% | 3.77% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 2.74% | 0.25% | 2.49% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 2.47% | 0.20% | 2.27% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.01% | 0.21% | 1.80% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp 2.45 6/26 | 1.81% | 0.16% | 1.65% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.71% | 0.16% | 1.55% |
| MARMarriott International, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.10% | 1.18% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 1.26% | 0.10% | 1.16% |
58.7% of RXI is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RXI or VTI?
RXI has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RXI or VTI?
Over the past year RXI returned -6.35% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RXI annualized +6.99% vs +9.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RXI or VTI?
RXI has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RXI -62.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RXI and VTI?
RXI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RXI and VTI?
58.7% of RXI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.0% of VTI's is in holdings RXI also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in RXI and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RXI or VTI?
RXI yields 1.53% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RXI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.