SAMT vs XYLG
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Which is better, SAMT or XYLG?
Each has led over a different period.
XYLG has a lower expense ratio. SAMT led over 3Y and the full window, XYLG over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAMT | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $805M | $69M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 12.87% |
| Holdings | 44 | 1,012 |
| YTD Return | +6.83% | +12.61%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +18.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.02%Best | +17.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.6% | -20.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $17,163Best | $16,603 |
| Fund Family | Strategas Asset Management, LLC | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2022 | Sep 18, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.7 years).
SAMT vs XYLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
SAMT vs XYLG Performance
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) is an ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year SAMT returned +7.08% while XYLG returned +18.12%. Year to date, SAMT is up 6.83% versus a gain of 12.61% for XYLG.
Over three years, SAMT compounded at +23.02% per year against +17.83% for XYLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 11.9% for XYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.6% for SAMT and -20.2% for XYLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAMT charges 0.66% per year while XYLG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $35 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAMT currently yields 0.65% against 12.87% for XYLG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 22.2% of XYLG's money is in holdings SAMT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SAMT, our book for it covers 82.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
XYLG and SAMT share little of their money.
23 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in SAMT and 490 in XYLG, against full books of 44 and 1,012.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SAMT | Weight in XYLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.19% | 5.60% | 3.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.57% | 3.82% | 1.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.45% | 2.16% | 0.29% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.08% | 1.28% | 1.80% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.65% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.94% | 0.94% | 2.00% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.06% | 0.69% | 2.37% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.12% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.53% | 0.98% | 1.55% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.73% | 0.58% | 2.15% |
22.2% of XYLG is already inside SAMT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAMT or XYLG?
SAMT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while XYLG charges 0.35%. XYLG is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SAMT or XYLG?
Over the past year SAMT returned +7.08% vs +18.12% for XYLG, so XYLG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SAMT or XYLG?
SAMT has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 11.9% for XYLG. Worst drawdown: SAMT -20.6% vs XYLG -20.2%.
Should I hold both SAMT and XYLG?
SAMT and XYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SAMT and XYLG?
At least 22.2% of XYLG's money is in holdings SAMT also owns. Our book for SAMT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in SAMT and 490 in XYLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAMT or XYLG?
SAMT yields 0.65% while XYLG yields 12.87%, so XYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYLG better than SAMT?
XYLG has a lower expense ratio. SAMT led over 3Y and the full window, XYLG over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.