SARK vs VTI
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SARK or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.74, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SARK | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.59% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -15.69% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -9.19% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -34.88% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -14.61% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 46.7% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.4% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $4,540 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
SARK vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
SARK vs VTI Performance
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SARK returned -9.19% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SARK is down 15.69% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SARK compounded at -34.88% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -14.61% and +11.99% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.7% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.4% for SARK and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.74. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SARK charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SARK currently yields 3.59% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SARK and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SARK or VTI?
SARK has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SARK or VTI?
Over the past year SARK returned -9.19% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SARK or VTI?
SARK has been the more volatile fund at 46.7% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SARK -83.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both SARK and VTI?
SARK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.74, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SARK or VTI?
SARK yields 3.59% while VTI yields 1.06%, so SARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SARK?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.74, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.