SAUG vs SNOV
FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August vs FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November
Which is better, SAUG or SNOV?
Each has led over a different period.
SAUG led over 3Y and the full window, SNOV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAUG | SNOV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90%Tie | 0.90%Tie |
| AUM | $128M | $113M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +4.40% | +8.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.03% | +6.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.29%Best | +10.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5% | 8.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -15.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $13,513Best | $13,488 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2023 | Nov 17, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
SAUG vs SNOV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
SAUG vs SNOV Performance
FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year SAUG returned +6.03% while SNOV returned +6.96%. Year to date, SAUG is up 4.40% versus a gain of 8.98% for SNOV.
Over three years, SAUG compounded at +11.29% per year against +10.87% for SNOV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.5% compared with 8.1% for SNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for SAUG and -15.4% for SNOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAUG charges 0.90% per year while SNOV charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $90 annually. On income, SAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SNOV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SAUG and SNOV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAUG or SNOV?
SAUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while SNOV charges 0.90%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, SAUG or SNOV?
Over the past year SAUG returned +6.03% vs +6.96% for SNOV, so SNOV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SAUG or SNOV?
SAUG has been the more volatile fund at 9.5% annualized versus 8.1% for SNOV. Worst drawdown: SAUG -14.6% vs SNOV -15.4%.
Should I hold both SAUG and SNOV?
SAUG and SNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAUG or SNOV?
SAUG yields 0.00% while SNOV yields 0.00%, so SNOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNOV better than SAUG?
SAUG led over 3Y and the full window, SNOV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.