SCDS vs SCDV
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, SCDS or SCDV?
SCDS has been ahead.
SCDS has a lower expense ratio. SCDS led over 1Y and the full window. SCDS is less concentrated, with 12.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCDS | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $9M | $148M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 279 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +17.38%Best | +6.54% |
| 1Y Return | +21.08%Best | +3.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,294Best | $10,403 |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.9%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
SCDS vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
SCDS vs SCDV Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Over the past year SCDS returned +21.08% while SCDV returned +3.53%. Year to date, SCDS is up 17.38% versus a gain of 6.54% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.5% for SCDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for SCDS and -22.8% for SCDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCDS charges 0.40% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $70 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCDS currently yields 1.12% against 0.43% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
3.5% of SCDS's money is in holdings SCDV also owns. 13.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings SCDS also owns.
SCDV and SCDS share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in SCDS and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 279 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 28 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for SCDS (82.6% of the fund), and 252 for SCDS that do not appear in SCDV (92.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCDS | Weight in SCDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AITApplied Industrial Technologies Inc | 0.46% | 3.52% | 3.06% |
| CPKChesapeake Utilities Corp | 0.63% | 2.43% | 1.80% |
| BCPCBalchem Corp | 0.51% | 2.33% | 1.82% |
| FFBCFirst Financial Bank. | 0.76% | 1.74% | 0.98% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 0.44% | 1.37% | 0.93% |
| BMIBadger Meter, Inc. | 0.26% | 1.15% | 0.89% |
| SWXSouthwest Gas Holdings Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 0.40% | 0.98% | 0.58% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCDS and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCDS or SCDV?
SCDS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SCDV charges 0.70%. SCDS is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCDS or SCDV?
Over the past year SCDS returned +21.08% vs +3.53% for SCDV, so SCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SCDS annualized +12.16% vs +2.22% for SCDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCDS or SCDV?
SCDS has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.5% for SCDV. Worst drawdown: SCDS -24.6% vs SCDV -22.8%.
Should I hold both SCDS and SCDV?
SCDS and SCDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCDS and SCDV?
13.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings SCDS also owns. 13.5% of SCDV's is in holdings SCDS also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in SCDS and 36 in SCDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCDS or SCDV?
SCDS yields 1.12% while SCDV yields 0.43%, so SCDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than SCDS?
SCDS has a lower expense ratio. SCDS led over 1Y and the full window. SCDS is less concentrated, with 12.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.